The global post-pandemic shift in workplace dynamics has fundamentally altered how organizations conduct meetings, with face-to-face, virtual, and hybrid formats emerging as the primary options. This study examines the current status-quo of meeting practices through a representative panel survey conducted in Germany and the United States (N = 1254). It explores meeting load, the distribution of meeting formats, and meeting satisfaction and perceived effectiveness of these formats. Additionally, meeting satisfaction and effectiveness are related to the Task-Media-Fit model. Findings reveal that face-to-face meetings remain the most common format (47.49%), followed by virtual (33.48%) and hybrid (14.82%) meetings. Differences between the two countries highlight a higher prevalence of hybrid meetings in the U.S. and more virtual meetings in Germany. Face-to-face meetings are rated highest in satisfaction and effectiveness, while hybrid meetings receive the lowest ratings. Results suggest that the Task-Media-Fit model might not predict appraisals of meetings in post-pandemic times. By providing scientifically rigorous, representative data, this research fills critical gaps left by non-scientific sources and contributes to a deeper understanding of how employees and organizations navigate the post-pandemic meeting landscape. These findings establish a foundation for future research on meeting design, effectiveness, and the implications of shifting workplace practices.
